Fascination About h4831sc load data

Fascination About h4831sc load data

Blog Article

I picked up a 50ct. box of 160 Nosler Accubonds, but I am hesitant to melt away the powder and projectiles on workup when all I have is 50 bullets. But I really need to find a bullet during the 160 course that my older rifle likes.

Ballistically, Hodgdon H4831 SC Powder is the exact duplicate of H4831. Physically, it's a shorter grain dimension, therefore, the designation SC or small Minimize. The shorter, a lot more compact kernels enable the powder to flow from the powder measures more efficiently, helping to reduce the regular reducing of granules.

You are accurate They may be the exact same the SC is brief Minimize so it meters much better, I do not Imagine you will get just common 4831 any more

Together with the 154 grain Hornady SP from the 280, H4831 gave me great groups and good velocity, but Rottweil R905 provides a drastically bigger velocity and presents marginally better accuracy. With Swift a hundred and fifty grain Sciroccos within the 7mm RM, H4831SC gave excellent precision and velocity, but RL22 was marginally much better. Consequently, in Each individual of such situations I went with Yet another powder, but I would definitely loathe to divest myself of your H4831.

Beginner to reloading. This will be used for a 300wsm with 215 bergers. I had been ready to get my palms on a few pounds of h4831.

Apache Jct Very good info, I've jars of both and always questioned if they could be reloaded Together with the exact recipes ought to I run out of one or one other.

Nampa, Idaho In my experience the only real distinction would be that the shortcut meters greater by way of reloading products. After It truly is loaded theres no useful big difference. I've read which the shortcut could possibly have a little little bit a lot quicker burn off fee but it seems insignificant.

Anyhow, I desired to give some 7828SC a attempt to minimize some of the compression. What a mistake, I couldn't get this powder to shoot accurately or make the velocities I get with standard 7828.

Along with the smoother move qualities arrives additional uniform demand weights, whilst the individual grains orient far more compactly, building better loading density.

Furthermore, it goes on to claim that because of the fshorter grains, that load density might be a little bit larger.

I've had similar expertise with H4350. For me, some ball powders will not likely shoot h4831 vs h4831sc properly with nearly anything other than Fed215's. Some parts just Will not Engage in properly with other. Appears like you've selected three superior powders, I'd personally be expecting no less than one of these to shoot.

This is certainly an Extraordinary extruded propellant and offers heightened insensitivity to cold and warm temperatures.

Both have the Identical burn off amount, shorter Reduce comes in handy Should you be at max fill rather h4831sc than at force/velocity that you might want you can get much more shortcut within a situation.

If I've a pound or two of a powder and get extra of the h4831 vs h4831sc same, only a distinct good deal variety, I will blend them all up so that I've a homogeneous batch of powder with which to work.